Skillz, a mobile gaming platform, has intensified its legal battle against unfair practices in the industry by filing a lawsuit against Voodoo, the creator of popular apps like “Blitz – Win Cash.” The lawsuit accuses Voodoo of misleadingly advertising its games as skill-based while allegedly employing bots to manipulate in-game outcomes.
Skillz asserts that these actions have not only deceived consumers but also harmed its own business, leading to lost customers and market share. The complaint highlights specific claims made by Voodoo in its advertising, arguing that these statements are false and deceptive.
Andrew Paradise, CEO of Skillz, emphasized during the company’s earnings call in May that combating fraudulent bot usage is crucial for ensuring fairness in gaming. He stressed the importance of eliminating systemic fraud to benefit consumers and the gaming industry as a whole. Skillz seeks damages from Voodoo, alleging financial losses due to the deceptive practices and unfair competition perpetuated by Voodoo’s alleged use of bots.
This legal action against Voodoo follows Skillz’s recent settlement of a patent infringement lawsuit against AviaGames, where similar allegations of bot usage were raised. The jury awarded Skillz $42.9 million in damages, and the case has prompted federal scrutiny of AviaGames’ operations.
Skillz has also pursued legal action against Papaya Gaming for similar reasons, underscoring its proactive stance against what it views as deceptive practices undermining the integrity of skill-based gaming.
In summary, Skillz’s lawsuit against Voodoo represents a continuation of its efforts to combat fraudulent practices in mobile gaming. The company alleges that Voodoo’s use of bots to manipulate game outcomes and its misleading advertising have harmed both consumers and competitors in the industry.
Skillz aims not only to seek damages for its losses but also to set a precedent for fair competition and consumer protection in the gaming sector.
