California Considers Banning Clear: Implications for Travel Security

California is in the spotlight with a new idea that could shake up how people go through airport security.

They’re thinking about being the first state to stop Clear, a service that lets travelers pay to get through security faster. This has sparked a big argument about what’s fair and who gets special treatment when flying.

What Is Ban Of Clear?

California is considering banning Clear, a service that helps people get through airport security faster. Senator Josh Newman introduced the legislation to tackle the gap between those who can afford special services and those who can’t. Clear, which speeds up security for its members, has become a symbol of inequality.

Ban of Clear
Supporters argue Clear exacerbates wait times, undermining the fairness of security procedures. (Credits: CBS News)

Newman explained, “It’s a basic fairness issue when you see people with a concierge service going ahead of those who have been waiting a long time in the TSA line.”

The bill, officially named SB-1372, doesn’t aim to shut down Clear completely. Instead, it wants to stop Clear’s fast lanes from merging with regular security lines. This would ease tension and make security checkpoints smoother.

Newman stressed the importance of a better and fairer travel experience for everyone, saying, “All it does is increase tension in the line.”

Response Of The Stakeholders

Support for the proposal comes from various groups, including the Association of Flight Attendants-CWA and the union representing Transportation Security Officers in key California cities. They argue that Clear makes wait times longer for regular travelers and isn’t fair to everyone.

Clear highlights its economic contribution, while critics stress concerns about fairness and equity. (Credits: Washington Times)

On the other hand, big airlines like Delta, United, and Alaska, which partner with Clear, say that limiting the service could mean longer lines and a worse experience for all travelers. They think it might hurt how smoothly they can run things and affect their business.

Clear says it helps the California economy by creating hundreds of jobs and sharing a lot of money with airports. The company says it’s all about making security faster without making things worse for people who aren’t members.

But critics, like James Smith from Travel Lingual, say this proposal brings up important questions about balancing convenience and fairness. “While Clear helps people save time if they’re willing to pay, we can’t ignore worries about fairness and making economic differences worse,” Smith pointed out.

Redefining Fairness: California’s Push for Equity in Air Travel

This move by California could change how services that speed up processes are used in public places like airports. These places often show a big gap between making things easy for some and being fair to everyone.

Airlines fear restricting Clear could lead to longer lines and diminish traveler experience. (Credits: StatesScoop)

As the California State Senate’s transportation committee gets ready to talk about the bill, people are watching to see what could happen next. It’s not just about California’s airports; it’s about a bigger conversation on fairness and privilege in travel across the whole country.

California’s bold move isn’t just about business—it’s about the ethics of who gets to use what in our world where people travel a lot. Whether this changes a lot about airport services or makes us think differently about how travel services make money from convenience, it’s a story we’ll all be paying attention to.

Sajda Parveen
Sajda Parveen
Sajda Praveen is a market expert. She has over 6 years of experience in the field and she shares her expertise with readers. You can reach out to her at [email protected]
Notify of
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
Would love your thoughts, please comment.x