• PEPE price was holding a key accumulation zone $0.0000091–$0.0000112 and still above the trendline support.
• There were now 441.89K PEPE holders, whales owning 46.15% of the tokens and the majority of addresses having less than $1K of PEPE.
• Pepe coin’s social volume started to rise since the end of April after a period of decline.

The meme coins slowly reignited, but a complete reversal that could see most of them recover their previous cycle highs was still to be confirmed.

PEPE coin price prediction analysis gave a detailed view of the potential movement with a combination of a couple of metrics in addition to price action analysis.

PEPE Coin Price Prediction Analysis

PEPE remained above its major support and hoarding zone, which is from $0.00000910 to $0.00001129. This area overlapped with the trendline support, which showed strength and meant the asset could soon break out.

Recently, the price went back to this level, indicating a bullish signal since it was able to rise near $0.00001120.

As the price kept rising, the next area to slow down was the resistance zone at $0.00001478 and a clear breakout would aim for $0.00001775.

It’s key to watch the support at $0.00000910 and $0.00001129, resistance at $0.00001478 and $0.00001775. The large upside goals were at $0.00002500, $0.00003500 and $0.00005500.

Breaking above $0.00001775 and holding at a high level might lead to more gains toward the $0.00002500–$0.00003500 zone.

If price managed to drop past $0.00000910, a rally down toward $0.00000631 or $0.00000542 may happen.

Should the breakdown take place, the upward potential would end, and price action resuming its upward trend would be delayed.

Price remaining above the trendline could help support the bullish trend, which suggested PEPE could continue its rising trend if its value remained above the line.

Having a price above $0.00001129 was still important. If control remained with buyers, PEPE might rise by 5 times to $0.00005500.

Overview of PEPE Coin Analytics

There were 441.89K PEPE holders with a total market cap at $4.9B, whales own 46.15% of the tokens, and the majority of addresses have less than $1K of PEPE.

Between April 28 and the time of writing, the number of wallets rose, and as many as 20,000 new users joined in just over a month.

As the trend continued, the market cap increased, which verified that there was still great demand for PEPE.

Nonetheless, most of the addresses (86.6%) held less than $ 1,000 of PEPE and were therefore unlikely to significantly influence prices.

While whales own 46.15% of the tokens, this made them susceptible to big PEPE sell-offs. Even so, most of the total supply was held by just a few people, so the market was still quite diversified.

About 63% of coins were cruising for weeks or months, 29% were owned by long-term holders, while 8% traded daily, showing a hold for the long-term mentality.

Should momentum and new holders increase, PEPE might climb. A sudden increase in whale selling may cause volatility, which is why caution is needed.

What Social Volume Means for PEPE Coin Price Prediction

Lastly, after being low for so long, the social volume of PEPE spiked sharply on the Santiment chart.

Whenever the prices go up or some new interesting news breaks out in the early part of June, the members of the community could be interested in PEPE again.

Many times, a lot of social media mentions foreshadow or appear at the same time as price shifts, which usually come from increased retail involvement.

If people’s enthusiasm continues and they keep participating, PEPE could experience short-term gains. If the social mentions decrease again, this could mean that only a small number of people stay interested.

For now, increased activity might support bulls, though for it to matter, prices must also increase with actual network action or demand from the market.

But if the jump was just noise from speculators, it might only lead to a brief surge that would be quickly followed by a drop.

Social volume was a major signal, yet it showed even if people were interested, not that they would definitely buy.

• Crypto hackers stole $244.1 million last month. Despite such a large amount, this stands as a 39% decrease from April’s losses.
• The Cetus DEX exploit alone made up nearly 90% of May’s thefts, with a total of $223 million siphoned off.
• Approximately $157 million (71%) of the funds stolen from Cetus DEX were successfully recovered.

The crypto industry continues to be a major target for cybercriminals, especially with hackers stealing a staggering $244.1 million in May.

While this number might come as a shock at first glance, it actually represents a 39% drop from April’s losses. This means that blockchain security could be improving on a micro scale.

According to data from blockchain security firm PeckShield, the bulk of last month’s damage came from a single exploit. Here’s a breakdown of May’s biggest crypto thefts and what they mean for the future.

The Cetus DEX Exploit

The biggest incident in May happened on May 22, when decentralized exchange Cetus DEX was hit by hackers.  The attacker made off with nearly $223 million, which stands as nearly 90% of the total funds stolen during the month.

The breach was traced to a vulnerability in the Most Significant Bits (MSB) check, which is a special smart contract security checker that makes sure that liquidity parameters are proper at all times.

By manipulating this flaw, the attacker was able to artificially increase their position in the pool, and then drain it in the process. Despite the severity of the attack though, it wasn’t a total loss.

Thanks to the quick collaboration between Cetus DEX and the Sui Network, around $157 million of the stolen funds (or around 71%) were successfully frozen and recovered.

Other Major Crypto Hacks in May

While the Cetus DEX exploit was the largest crypto theft within the month, several smaller but still damaging attacks occurred throughout May: The Cork Protocol Hack was the second-largest exploit of the month, and saw hackers steal 3,761 wstETH (Wrapped Staked Ether), worth around $12 million.

The stolen tokens were later converted to Ethereum, in what made recovery even more difficult. The DPRK Incident was suspected to be tied to North Korea’s Lazarus Group. This hack resulted in losses of around $5.2 million.

In addition, the MBU Token Exploit led to losses of about $2.2 million, alongside the MapleStory Universe Attack which saw the loss of around $1.2 million.

Signs of Progress?

Even though the figures are still high, the $244.1 million stolen in May is a major reduction from April’s $400 million+ in losses. It’s also a positive development compared to February, when a single exploit from Bybit accounted for over $1.53 billion in losses.

According to PeckShield, the total losses in Q1 reached $1.63 billion, with January’s losses adding another $87 million. When compared to the numbers from May, it already seems that crypto platforms are starting to take security more seriously. While the decline in thefts is promising, it would be a mistake to become lax in security or vigilance.

Hackers are always improving their strategies, and new attack vectors are likely to surface as the space grows. Smart contract platforms must continue to perform security audits, bug bounty programs, and formal verification.

Meanwhile, end users should be on high alert, especially when interacting with lesser-known defi protocols or investing in new tokens.

The Cetus exploit shows that even major platforms can fall victim to a single vulnerability.  However, the fast response shows that damage can be controlled, if the right tools are in place.

May 2025 proved that the crypto space is far from winning its fight against hackers. While the total value stolen has declined so far, the industry cannot afford to let its guard down.

The crypto community, from developers to investors, must treat security not as an afterthought, but as a major part of innovation.

• Average ETH ETF investors are currently facing unrealized losses of around 21%, according to Glassnode.
• ETH’s price has dropped from ~$3,536 at its U.S. ETF launch in July 2024 to around $2,600.
• The reintroduction of U.S. trade tariffs mostly contributed to Ethereum’s price decline, with ETH hitting a yearly low of $1,472.

Ethereum investors who jumped into the market through the spot ETFs from BlackRock and Fidelity are now facing massive losses. Ethereum is currently struggling to stay above $2,600, and according to Glassnode data, the average ETF investor is currently nursing unrealized losses of around 21%.

Despite recent gains on ETH and a small rally from last week, bearish technical indicators show a disturbing future for Ethereum’s price action. Here’s what to keep in mind.

Ethereum ETFs Leave Investors “Substantially Underwater”

When the spot Ether ETFs launched in the U.S. in July 2024, there was much fanfare.

Big names like BlackRock and Fidelity were in on the action and on launch day, ETH was trading around $3,536. At the time of writing, however, it was hovering near $2,501. This means that investors who bought in early are facing heavy losses.

According to a May 29 report by Glassnode, the average cost basis for BlackRock’s Ethereum ETF is around $3,300, while Fidelity’s average entry point is even higher at $3,500.

With ETH currently down over 25% from those levels, most ETF investors are “substantially underwater.”

Glassnode notes that outflows from these funds started to become serious whenever Ethereum’s spot price dipped below those average entry points. This was especially noticeable in August 2024, as well as in January and March of this year.

Trade War Fears and Political Pressure

One major event that contributed to Ethereum’s downturn was the reintroduction of trade tariffs.  On February 2nd, ETH was trading above $3,000. However, just days later, US President Donald Trump signed an executive order that imposed heavy tariffs on imports from China, Canada, and Mexico.

The market reaction was severe, and risk assets (including cryptocurrencies) fell heavily as investors pulled capital out in a panic. On April 9th, the day Trump’s tariffs officially went into effect, Ethereum had crashed to its 2025 low of $1,472.

While the rest of the crypto market has somewhat recovered from that low, ETH’s price has not rebounded enough to bring these ETF investors any comfort.

Recent Inflows And Possible Stabilization

Despite the gloomy picture, there are signs of incoming interest in Ethereum ETFs. For example, since May 16, these assets have seen nine consecutive days of inflows worth $435.6 million.

Analysts believe this change is due to sentiment from the easing of trade war concerns. On May 28th, a U.S. federal court blocked major parts of the tariff policy, in a development that massively boosted investor confidence.

Still, the effects of the Ethereum ETFs on the rest of the market are limited. According to Glassnode, these ETFs accounted for just ±1.5% of Ethereum’s total spot trading volume at launch.

Even during peak growth in November of last year (amid Trump’s re-election), the volume share rose only slightly above 2.5% before declining again.

ETH Faces Major Downside Risk

From a technical standpoint, Ethereum’s current price action appears bearish. In the last 24 hours, ETH around 1%, after sliding back toward the $2,500 mark. This decline came after the cryptocurrency failed to hold itself above $2,780.

Ethereum has also broken below its 7-day Simple Moving Average, which shows short-term control by bearish traders. The Relative Strength Index (RSI) has dipped below the neutral 50 level on the hourly timeframe, while the MACD indicator is firmly in bearish territory.

In essence, both of these show that momentum is tilting downward. Investors should note that Ethereum’s current price action is largely ranging between two important price levels.

Immediate resistance lies at $2,625, followed by stronger hurdles at $2,650 and $2,720. If ETH can break above $2,720, it could aim for higher targets at $2,880 or even $2,950.

On the downside, if support around $2,600 fails, ETH could retest the $2,500 and $2,440 zones.

• Solana Strategies now holds 420K SOL after investing $4.7M this week, fully exiting its Bitcoin position
• Upexi adds 77,879 locked SOL at $151.50, gaining $2.1M as current prices hover near $178
• Solana leads in active addresses and revenue while attracting major corporate treasury interest

Institutional backing for Solana (SOL) is growing stronger as major firms pour millions into the network, as market confidence rises. This week, SOL Strategies added 26,478 SOL to its treasury, bringing its total SOL holdings to 420,355 SOL, or nearly $100 million.

A wave of corporate investments followed, and Upexi was the next to follow with a discounted SOL purchase worth $11.8 million. Solana dominates usage metrics, and these moves signal that a new all-time high could be approaching this summer.

Firms Deepen SOL Exposure, Exit Bitcoin Positions

This week, SOL Strategies confirmed the acquisition of 26,478 SOL for $4.7 million, moving its treasury fully into Solana. All Bitcoin holdings have been exited, and the firm holds 420,355 SOL, worth roughly CAD $100 million. It is in alignment with its long-term strategy of validator growth and ecosystem participation.

Moreover, a U.S. based consumer product company, Upexi bought 77,879 locked SOL at $151.50 per token for a total of $11.8 million.

As of writing this, their total SOL holdings are 679,677, worth $121.2 million, and they are very bullish on Solana’s future.

Additionally, the DeFi Dev Corp invested more than 600,000 SOL (worth about $100 million) into its treasury diversification plan. As motivators, the company pointed to Solana’s scalability, cost efficiency, and growing DeFi and meme coin activity.

These large inflows reflect increasing institutional conviction that Solana will be a long term competitive chain.

On-Chain Growth Supports Bullish Price Structure

In the blockchain sector, Solana is still the leader in network activity with 91 million monthly active addresses.

While writing, it had a 40.3% market share of Layer 1 blockchains, more than double that of NEAR Protocol and far ahead of Ethereum’s 6.7 million active addresses. This growth has been steady for several months and is increasing real-world usage.

Revenue generated by Solana-based apps also paints a bullish picture. Meme coin platform Pump.fun, which runs on Solana, made $1.21 million in 24 hours, more than Ethereum’s $934,987.

Other Solana-based apps, such as Jupiter and Phantom, also made the top revenue generators, which helped bolster the sentiment for the network.

Some participants are rotating capital within the ecosystem, even as activity spikes. The latest in a series of over 3.49 million SOL moved, Pump.fun deposited 156,425 SOL worth $25.74 million to Kraken.

This includes the sale of 264,373 SOL for $41.6 million USDC at $158, which indicates both liquidity and demand are strong.

Price Chart Reflects Breakout Potential Ahead of Summer

In addition, Solana’s technical setup is also bullish and continues to show bullish continuation as the current price breaks above key resistance near $220.

With consistently higher highs and higher lows on the 3-day chart, Solana’s technical setup suggests a bullish breakout is possible. At press time, SOL was trading at around $155.3 and was heading towards key resistance at the $178–$180 zone.

A breach of this level with strong volume would see the next major resistance near $260, the last hurdle before a retest of the all-time high.

The volume data shows the growing interest, as accumulation patterns follow each correction. The buyers kept stepping in at support zones and turning the resistance into solid bases for the next leg up. Analysts say if buying pressure holds, the next breakout target could reach or exceed $300.

Higher user activity, greater on-chain revenue, and lower transaction fees are all indicators that Solana is gaining competitive strength against Ethereum.

Solana’s ability to handle up to 2,600 transactions per second was noted by DeFi Dev Corp in its recent interview, a key advantage over Ethereum’s more limited throughput. That comparison is sparking broader conversation about Solana’s long-term market share.