Distress of $30 Million Has Discerned Tech Debt Following Creditor Disputes

There’s a new trend in finance happening, especially with struggling tech companies like Rackspace Technology Inc. and Apex Tool Group.

It’s called “non-pro rata up tiering” transactions, where certain lenders get better deals when they exchange their debt.

However, some people are worried this might not be fair and could make financial inequalities worse among lenders.

Concerns over fairness and financial disparities among creditors sparked by favorable debt swap terms. (Credits: Pixabay)

This trend is happening because borrowing money is expensive, companies have borrowed a lot, and loans today don’t always have strict rules. Jason Mudrick, who started Mudrick Capital, says these factors are behind the trend.

Tech companies, which owe nearly $30 billion in struggling debt, are leading the way in using this strategy to handle their debts during tough times.

Debt Swaps Spark Creditor Disparities

Recent deals have stirred up controversy in the world of debt restructuring. Take, for instance, Apex Tool Group backed by Bain Capital, and Rackspace backed by Apollo Global Management Inc.

Tech sector leads with $30 billion distressed debt, managing liabilities amidst tough financial conditions. (Credits: Industry Connect)

They’ve proposed deals where some creditors get better swap rates than others, causing big differences in how they’re treated.

This has sparked conflicts between creditors, with those not involved in the negotiations at risk of losing their collateral and agreements, which could mean they get paid back later.

According to Scott Macklin from Obra, the tough tactics used by distressed funds show how desperate the market is, especially when there aren’t many troubled bonds and loans available.

Legal Moves Raise Ethical Concerns

These tactics might be allowed by law in a lot of cases, but they bring up ethical concerns about how creditors are treated and the fairness of struggling debt markets.

Legal maneuvers raise ethical questions about creditor treatment and integrity of distressed debt markets. (Credits: Jesse Fox Mayshark)

The wording that allows these deals, often added to bond documents during a time when leveraged buyouts were popular, has created a situation where conflicts between creditors and lawsuits happen more often.

A good example is the bankruptcy of appliance maker Robertshaw, where a deal made before filing for bankruptcy with certain investors changed who got paid back first, leaving some lenders in a tough spot.

Sajda Parveen
Sajda Parveen
Sajda Praveen is a market expert. She has over 6 years of experience in the field and she shares her expertise with readers. You can reach out to her at [email protected]
Notify of
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
Would love your thoughts, please comment.x