Joseph Quinn, with his shaved head and infectious smile, exudes a vibrant energy that matches his diverse and burgeoning career in film and television. Known for roles like Eddie Munson in “Stranger Things” and upcoming appearances in major films such as “A Quiet Place: Day One,” “Gladiator II,” and Marvel’s “The Fantastic Four,” Quinn is making waves in Hollywood.

In “A Quiet Place: Day One,” Quinn plays Eric, a character who defies traditional masculine norms by portraying vulnerability and fear amidst a harrowing alien invasion. His approach focuses on authenticity rather than conventional heroics, a choice that sets his performance apart in the thriller genre. Quinn’s ability to convey deep emotion using minimal dialogue highlights his skill in visual storytelling.

His upcoming role in “Gladiator II” sees him alongside a stellar cast, including Paul Mescal and Pedro Pascal, in a sequel that pays homage to its predecessor while exploring new narrative dimensions. Quinn describes the experience of working with Ridley Scott as transformative, emphasizing Scott’s mastery in creating immersive cinematic worlds.

Transitioning to his role in Marvel’s “The Fantastic Four,” where he portrays Johnny Storm, Quinn discusses his preparation, including physical training to embody the superhero role. He acknowledges the legacy of previous actors who portrayed the character, aiming to bring his own interpretation while respecting established fan expectations.

Throughout his interview with Men’s Health, Quinn reflects on the diverse challenges and joys of his career. From learning from feline co-stars in “A Quiet Place: Day One” to sharing anecdotes about training for physically demanding roles, Quinn’s enthusiasm and dedication shine through. He approaches each project with a blend of humility and ambition, eager to explore new genres and character dynamics.

Looking ahead, Quinn expresses a desire for personal pursuits like a surfing holiday, balancing his intense professional commitments with moments of relaxation and exploration. His multifaceted interests and genuine enthusiasm for storytelling underscore his evolving presence in the entertainment industry.

Joseph Quinn’s journey from breakout roles to blockbuster franchises exemplifies not only his talent but also his versatility as an actor. With each project, he continues to challenge conventions and captivate audiences, promising an exciting future in Hollywood.

Apple recently changed its rules to allow retro game emulators on iPhones and iPads, letting gamers play old games without needing workarounds. However, this new policy does not include emulators for old PC systems like DOS or early Windows, and such apps are still not allowed in the App Store.

The Verge reported that Apple told developers that PC emulators break the App Store’s rules, particularly section 4.7, which has also caused issues for game streaming services. While Apple now accepts “game emulators” and “retro game console emulator apps,” it does not accept emulators for older PC software like DOS and Windows.

Developers of apps like iDOS 3 and UTM SE virtual machine had their submissions rejected, with Apple stating these apps were not “emulators of retro game consoles.” Even though these programs can play old PC games, Apple did not consider this in their decision.

Apple’s rules are unclear, as seen with the Commodore 64, which is considered a console despite being sold as a personal computer. This means developers are often surprised when their apps are rejected for rule violations they were unaware of.

Unlike Apple, Google’s Play Store for Android allows almost any emulation app as long as they don’t include copyrighted files. Apple’s change seems to have happened around the time the European Union required third-party app stores on iOS. This may allow EU users to run PC emulators on iPhones and iPads through other app stores, though it won’t be as easy as using the App Store.

The cryptocurrency boom has not only opened up new financial opportunities but also created a fertile ground for scammers. A recent alert from the FBI highlights a troubling trend where fraudsters are specifically targeting individuals who have already fallen victim to cryptocurrency scams.

These scammers pose as law firms or lawyers who claim to specialize in recovering funds lost in crypto schemes, adding another layer of deceit to an already complex problem.

The FBI’s public service announcement, noted by BleepingComputer, explains how these scammers use social media to contact their victims.

They pretend to be legal professionals, sometimes even claiming affiliations with the FBI or the Consumer Financial Protection Bureau. By presenting themselves as legitimate recovery agents, they exploit the victims’ desperation and hope for recovering their lost funds.

This secondary scam operates on the principle that people who have been scammed once are more likely to be deceived again. Victims of initial crypto scams are already vulnerable, having shown susceptibility to social engineering tactics.

The fraudsters promise to take legal action against the original scammers, which acts as bait, but their real objective is to extract more money or personal information from the victims.

The methods used by these scammers vary. They might ask for personal banking information, direct payments for supposed services, or introduce complicated schemes involving fees or “back taxes.” Once they gather enough information or receive payment, they disappear, leaving the victims in an even worse situation.

According to the FBI, this kind of scam has resulted in approximately $9 million in losses from February 2023 to 2024, highlighting the ongoing risk within the broader landscape of cryptocurrency fraud.

While law enforcement can occasionally track and recover stolen cryptocurrency, and legitimate legal action is sometimes possible, it is rare for lawyers to proactively contact victims via social media.

Unfortunately, most people scammed in the crypto space either do not know their scammers’ true identities or lack viable legal recourse. This harsh reality underscores the need for heightened awareness and caution among potential and past victims of crypto scams.

The FDA has approved the first quick test for hepatitis C virus (HCV). It detects HCV RNA and helps diagnose people showing signs of hepatitis C. Healthcare providers can use it in places like doctors’ offices and urgent care centers, avoiding the need to send samples to distant labs.

The new test can deliver results within an hour using a fingertip blood sample, enabling healthcare providers to diagnose and discuss treatment options or refer patients to care during the same visit.

This is a significant improvement from previous practices where the testing process required multiple steps and visits, potentially leading to loss of follow-up and missed diagnoses.

Jeff Shuren, MD, JD, of the FDA’s Center for Devices and Radiological Health, emphasized that providing healthcare providers with tools to diagnose and treat patients on the same visit could greatly increase the number of patients diagnosed and treated for hepatitis C.

Despite the availability of effective direct-acting antivirals for HCV over the past decade, cure rates in the U.S. remain low, with as many as 4 million people affected by the virus.

The CDC’s 2020 recommendation that all adults be screened for HCV at least once, and pregnant women during each pregnancy, highlights the need for improved testing methods. The current multistep process for HCV testing often results in patients not receiving a timely diagnosis or treatment, contributing to the spread and progression of the virus.

Chronic HCV infection can lead to severe health complications such as liver cancer or liver failure if untreated. In 2022, hepatitis C was linked to over 12,000 deaths.

Symptoms of HCV infection can range from jaundice and poor appetite to nausea, stomach pain, and fatigue. Jonathan Mermin, MD, MPH, of the CDC, noted the significance of the new test in potentially curing more people, provided it is affordable and accessible.

The FDA specified that the test is not intended to monitor patients undergoing HCV treatment or to screen blood or tissue donors. There are risks associated with the test, such as false-positive or false-negative results, which could lead to unnecessary anxiety or delays in treatment.

However, the rapid and accessible nature of the test represents a hopeful advancement in the diagnosis and management of hepatitis C, aiming to reduce the disease’s impact and spread.

NBCUniversal’s streaming service, Peacock, is offering a new feature called “Your Daily Olympic Recap on Peacock” for the 2024 Summer Olympics.

This service allows users to select their preferred sports and types of highlights to receive a personalized daily recap read by an AI-generated version of legendary broadcaster Al Michaels. These recaps will last about 10 minutes and summarize the previous day’s Olympic events.

Al Michaels was initially hesitant about this AI project but changed his mind after seeing a demonstration of the technology. He expressed his curiosity and eventual support for the initiative despite his initial skepticism. The demonstration showcased the AI’s capability to mimic his voice convincingly, which won him over.

Engadget experienced a demo of the AI-generated recaps and reported that the artificial voice closely matches Michaels’ real voice, capturing his unique intonations and rhythms. NBCUniversal used extensive recordings of Michaels’ past broadcasts on NBC to train the AI.

Michaels, who is 79 years old, currently works with Amazon’s Thursday Night Football and holds an emeritus position at NBC Sports.

Peacock’s Olympic recaps will utilize content from up to 5,000 hours of live coverage and aim to provide nearly 7 million personalized variations of the recaps. The recaps will cover around 40 concurrent Olympic events daily.

NBCUniversal has assured that all AI-generated content will be reviewed by human editors before being sent out to users to prevent errors and ensure quality.

Users can start opting into the recaps on July 27, the day after the Opening Ceremony of the Paris 2024 Summer Olympics, which begins on July 26. Interested viewers can sign up for these personalized recaps on Peacock’s Olympics website and through the Peacock mobile app, supporting various browsers like Chrome, Safari, Firefox, and Edge.

The Virginia Tech Helmet Lab, known for pioneering safety ratings in varsity football helmets, is expanding its scope beyond athletics by developing a new safety ratings system for construction helmets.

This initiative marks the first time the lab will apply its expertise outside sports, aiming to enhance head protection in one of the most hazardous industries. Construction, notorious for its high incidence of traumatic brain injuries (TBIs), serves as a critical focus due to its alarming workplace fatality rates.

Scheduled to commence this summer, the 18-month study aims to create a rating system similar to the lab’s existing five-star scale used in sports. Led by Steve Rowson, the lab’s director, the project seeks to characterize head impact and concussion risks specific to construction environments.

By analyzing accident reports and surveillance footage, researchers will identify prevalent injury scenarios and replicate these conditions in controlled laboratory tests.

Utilizing their Summation of Tests for the Analysis of Risk (STAR) model, which aggregates data from various test sites, the lab plans to generate an overall performance score for construction helmets.

This score, ranging from one to five stars, will provide stakeholders with crucial insights into helmet effectiveness under real-world conditions. The project aims to mitigate the severity of head injuries among construction workers, potentially saving lives by promoting the adoption of more effective personal protective equipment.

Scheduled for completion by August 2025, this pioneering effort underscores the lab’s commitment to advancing safety standards beyond sports, leveraging its biomechanics expertise to address pressing occupational safety challenges.

By bridging the gap between research and practical application, the Virginia Tech Helmet Lab aims to empower decision-makers to safeguard workers from the devastating impacts of head injuries in the construction industry.

The proposed framework by La Trobe University’s Judith Lumley Center challenges conventional categorizations of coping strategies in childbirth to foster autonomy and empower women based on their individual preferences and values.

This initiative responds to growing concerns highlighted in the New South Wales Parliamentary Inquiry into Birth Trauma, aiming to improve maternity care experiences.

Published in Midwifery, the research critiques current classifications of coping strategies—pharmacological versus non-pharmacological—advocating for a holistic approach.

Dr. Laura Whitburn, along with collaborators Dr. Lester Jones and lead author Janine Shifman, proposes categorizing coping strategies as “intrinsic” (self-generated) and “extrinsic” (requiring external assistance), aiming to shift focus away from over-reliance on medical interventions.

Their study surveyed pregnant women at Mercy Hospital for Women, revealing that feeling safe, supported, and prepared were pivotal factors during labor, often prioritized over pain relief.

Intrinsic strategies like breathing techniques and a positive mindset were commonly valued, while extrinsic methods such as showers, TENS machines, and support from partners were also crucial.

The framework seeks to balance these approaches, recognizing that a combination of intrinsic and extrinsic strategies supports women’s autonomy and enhances their childbirth experience.

It encourages healthcare providers to view pharmacological options as part of a broader toolkit rather than the default solution, thereby promoting a more supportive and empowering birthing environment.

The aim is to reshape discussions around coping strategies in childbirth, fostering a mindset of support and empowerment rather than intervention, thereby improving outcomes and experiences for birthing women.

The cholesterol drug fenofibrate could help slow down diabetic retinopathy in people with early signs of the disease, reducing the need for more invasive treatments like laser surgery or eye injections.

This was shown in the LENS trial, where over 1,100 participants took either fenofibrate or a placebo for four years. Those on fenofibrate had a 27% lower chance of their eye disease getting worse or needing treatment. This benefit was seen in people with both type 1 and type 2 diabetes, no matter their kidney health.

Lead author David Preiss, PhD, emphasized the potential of fenofibrate to prevent the need for retinal treatments, which have significant downsides, by using the drug early in the disease process.

The findings were presented at the American Diabetes Association’s annual Scientific Sessions and published in NEJM Evidence. Previous studies, including the 2005 FIELD study and the 2010 ACCORD study, also suggested the benefits of fenofibrate for diabetic retinopathy, but LENS is the first study dedicated solely to investigating this effect.

Thomas W. Gardner, MD, commented that the LENS trial results are encouraging and consistent with previous findings, suggesting that fenofibrate can reduce the progression of retinopathy by about a third.

He highlighted the drug’s safety, low cost, and oral administration as significant advantages, particularly for patients with early-stage disease who currently have limited treatment options.

The LENS trial, conducted at 11 National Health Service centers in Scotland from 2018 to 2021, involved participants with mild background retinopathy or maculopathy. They were given 145 mg of fenofibrate or a placebo daily or every other day for those with impaired kidney function.

The primary outcome was a composite measure of developing referable diabetic retinopathy or requiring treatment, which occurred significantly less often in the fenofibrate group compared to the placebo group (22.7% vs. 29.2%).

Fenofibrate also significantly reduced the occurrence of any retinopathy or maculopathy progression and the need for treatment. Macular edema was notably less common in the fenofibrate group (3.8%) compared to the placebo group (7.5%).

However, there were no differences in visual function, quality of life, or visual acuity between the groups, likely because participants had early-stage retinopathy without visual impairment.

Regarding safety, there were no major cardiovascular events or significant differences in nontraumatic lower limb amputations between the groups. Fenofibrate led to a reversible increase in blood creatinine levels, which could be misinterpreted as renal harm, although previous studies suggest it might be renoprotective over the long term.

Future monitoring of eye and kidney function in these participants over the next 10 years is planned, along with additional trials in Australia and the Protocol AF trial in the US to further support fenofibrate’s use in early diabetic retinopathy.

At the G7 summit in Italy, President Biden has drawn criticism for what some perceive as lapses in focus and awkward public moments.

Reports suggest Biden’s interactions have been marred by incidents such as an awkward salute to Italian Prime Minister Giorgia Meloni and wandering away during a skydiving demonstration, requiring Prime Minister Meloni to guide him back to the group.

Moreover, Biden reportedly kept Meloni waiting for 20 minutes before their initial meeting, prompting a humorous chiding from her upon his arrival.

Despite these moments, Biden has also been noted for displaying clarity during discussions with other world leaders on pressing global issues.

The White House has dismissed criticisms of Biden’s performance, with senior deputy press secretary Andrew Bates labeling such reports as untrue and emphasizing Biden’s effective leadership on matters of national security.

Criticism regarding Biden’s mental acuity has persisted, exacerbated by reports of him using cheat sheets and appearing fatigued during meetings.

This concern has not been limited to political adversaries but has also resonated among Democratic lawmakers and a significant portion of the electorate, as highlighted by polling data indicating widespread doubts about Biden’s ability to complete another presidential term.

Despite these challenges, the summit itself has seen significant diplomatic activity, including the signing of a 10-year security agreement with Ukraine and substantial financial aid pledges to support Ukraine’s defense efforts against Russia.

This underscores ongoing international cooperation and strategic commitments despite the distractions surrounding Biden’s public appearances.

Looking ahead, Biden faces scrutiny not only from domestic observers but also from global audiences as he prepares for upcoming debates and continues to navigate critical diplomatic engagements.

The contrasting perceptions of his leadership abilities reflect broader concerns about continuity and effectiveness in American leadership on the world stage.

The U.S. Navy, historically prepared for major global conflicts, finds itself embroiled in a prolonged and intense maritime battle against Iran-backed Houthi rebels in Yemen.

Previously focused on potential adversaries like Russia and China, the Navy now faces a persistent threat from the Houthis, whose arsenal has evolved from basic weaponry to sophisticated drones, missiles, and other advanced systems.

This conflict has significantly disrupted shipping routes in the Red Sea, which is crucial for access to the Suez Canal and the Mediterranean, with over 50 vessels targeted since November.

The Houthi attacks, ostensibly aimed at supporting Palestinians in Gaza and strengthening their position in Yemen, pose a serious and escalating danger to U.S. ships, allies, and commercial vessels.

The Navy’s response has been constant vigilance and rapid reaction, exemplified by the Arleigh Burke-class destroyer USS Laboon, whose crews face daily threats of missile barrages and drone attacks.

The intensity of these engagements marks the most sustained combat for the U.S. Navy since World War II, presenting challenges akin to the “Tanker Wars” in the 1980s but with more direct and frequent assaults.

The operational environment remains hazardous, recalling past incidents such as the 1987 USS Stark attack and the 2000 bombing of the USS Cole, underscoring the persistent dangers faced by naval forces in the region.

The Houthis’ capabilities have grown with Iranian support, including financial aid, intelligence, and training, despite international sanctions aimed at curtailing such assistance. The conflict has also escalated in the air, with airstrikes targeting Houthi infrastructure in Yemen and retaliatory measures against naval assets.

Despite these challenges, there is strategic caution in direct U.S. military escalation against the Houthis, influenced by broader regional dynamics and efforts to reduce tensions with Iran.

The U.S. Navy’s role remains pivotal, balancing deterrence and defensive actions while maintaining regional stability. Meanwhile, Saudi Arabia, engaged in a prolonged conflict with the Houthis, seeks diplomatic solutions while neighboring states navigate complex geopolitical considerations around U.S. military presence and operations.

Economically, the conflict has taken a toll, affecting vital shipping lanes and revenue for countries like Egypt that are reliant on the Suez Canal. The strategic implications extend beyond immediate naval engagements, influencing regional alliances and perceptions.

Despite calls for more decisive action against the Houthis, the U.S. approach remains calibrated, reflecting broader geopolitical realities and ongoing diplomatic efforts.

As the conflict continues to evolve, the Navy’s commitment to safeguarding maritime security in the face of evolving threats underscores the complexities of modern naval warfare and U.S. strategic interests in the Middle East.

In a recent statement, President Vladimir Putin outlined Russia’s conditions for ending its ongoing war in Ukraine, marking a departure from previous vague assertions.

Putin asserted that Russia would only consider ceasing hostilities if Ukraine surrenders control of Donetsk, Luhansk, Kherson, and Zaporizhzhia regions, regions that Moscow claims as part of its own territory. Furthermore, he demanded that Ukraine abandon its aspirations to join NATO and demilitarize while calling for the lifting of Western sanctions against Russia.

These terms were swiftly dismissed by Ukrainian officials as unrealistic and offensive. Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelensky likened Putin’s demands to historical aggressions, drawing parallels to Adolf Hitler’s tactics in the lead-up to World War II.

Zelensky emphasized that Putin’s proposal mirrored Hitler’s annexation strategy, casting doubt on Russia’s sincerity and trustworthiness in negotiations.

Putin’s conditions highlight Russia’s failure to achieve its initial military objectives in Ukraine, where it now controls approximately a fifth of Ukrainian territory, including Crimea, annexed in 2014. Despite this, Putin emphasized that Russia would ensure a safe withdrawal of Ukrainian forces from the specified regions once Kyiv agreed to his terms.

The timing of Putin’s statement, on the eve of a Swiss peace conference excluding Russia, reflects Moscow’s skepticism towards international efforts to broker a resolution. Putin dismissed the conference as a diversionary tactic, underscoring his preference for direct negotiations where his conditions are met.

Ukrainian officials, including presidential adviser Mykhailo Podolyak, urged the international community not to entertain Putin’s proposals, labeling them as lacking in substance and a genuine desire for peace. Podolyak criticized Russia’s stance as a continuation of war by other means aimed at avoiding accountability rather than achieving a lasting resolution.

As tensions persist and diplomatic efforts unfold, the stark contrast between Russia’s demands and Ukraine’s stance underscores the complexity and volatility of the conflict, with implications extending beyond regional borders.

The international community faces the challenge of navigating these entrenched positions while striving for a sustainable path to peace in Eastern Europe.

Social Security beneficiaries are expected to receive a smaller cost-of-living adjustment (COLA) next year than originally predicted, which aligns with a recent moderation in inflation. Mary Johnson, a retired analyst specializing in Social Security and Medicare, projects the COLA to be approximately 3%, citing May’s inflation figures.

The Consumer Price Index (CPI) reported no change from the previous month and a 3.3% increase from the same period last year. These figures were lower than anticipated, suggesting a potential reduction in inflationary pressures affecting the U.S. economy.

The annual adjustment in Social Security benefits is determined by the Consumer Price Index for Urban Wage Earners and Clerical Workers (CPI-W), specifically from the months of July, August, and September. In May, the CPI-W also reported a 3.3% increase, aligning with the broader CPI trends.

If beneficiaries receive a 3% increase in their monthly payments next year, it would mark a significant decrease from recent years, including an 8.7% rise in 2023 and a 3.2% increase in 2024. Despite this, a 3% increase remains higher than the average 2.6% seen over the past two decades.

For the average retiree receiving $1,907 monthly, a 3% increase would equate to approximately $57.21 more per month. However, concerns persist that the CPI-W might underestimate real inflation for seniors, as it assumes a spending pattern that differs significantly from actual retiree expenses.

Inflation has been a major economic issue, impacting households across the income spectrum but particularly affecting lower-income Americans who face heightened financial strain due to rising costs for essential goods like food and housing.

Despite recent decreases from mid-2022 peaks, inflation levels have remained substantial, with households needing significantly more money each month compared to previous years.

The final adjustment percentage for Social Security benefits next year will be released by the Social Security Administration in mid-October, providing clarity on how much recipients can expect their payments to increase.

The International Energy Agency (IEA) has highlighted a potential oversupply in the global oil market, which could disrupt OPEC+ efforts to maintain high oil prices through production cuts.

The IEA forecasts significant growth in oil production, primarily driven by the United States and other American countries, which could dramatically increase the world’s spare oil capacity.

This surplus, projected to be around 8 million barrels per day by 2030, could become one of the largest in history, similar to levels observed during the COVID-19 pandemic when oil prices plummeted.

The IEA’s medium-term oil market report indicates that this surplus could challenge OPEC+’s current strategy to manage and support oil prices. The potential excess in supply might lead to a prolonged period of lower oil prices.

OPEC+, a coalition that includes Russia and other producers, has not yet responded to these projections. This situation underscores the complexity of balancing supply and demand in a market influenced by geopolitical and economic factors.

In addition to the anticipated surplus, the IEA predicts a gradual decline in the growth of global oil demand. This slowdown is expected to occur progressively over the decade, with demand peaking around 2029 before slightly contracting in 2030.

The shift towards clean energy technologies, particularly the increase in electric vehicle (EV) sales, is a significant factor contributing to the reduced demand for oil. This transition underscores the broader trend towards renewable energy sources and away from fossil fuels.

OPEC+ has been implementing production cuts for approximately two years to mitigate the risk of an oversupply that could lead to falling oil prices, impacting the economies of its member states. Recently, the group decided to extend these cuts into 2025, with plans to start easing them from October 1.

Despite these measures, oil prices have seen a downward trend in recent months, indicating that the market might already be adjusting to changes in supply and demand dynamics.

The decline in oil prices is evident in the recent performance of major benchmarks. Brent crude has fallen nearly 9% since early April, trading at $83 per barrel, down from $91. Similarly, West Texas Intermediate (WTI) crude has dropped 9% to $79 per barrel, down from nearly $87.

Factors contributing to these price declines include record levels of US oil production, which have increased global supply, and concerns about weak demand in China, the world’s largest oil importer, as well as in other significant economies. These developments reflect the complex interplay between production levels, geopolitical events, and economic conditions in shaping the global oil market.

President Biden’s re-election campaign is actively shaping public perception of former President Trump’s business acumen as Trump prepares to address a gathering of nearly 100 CEOs at the Business Roundtable event in Washington, D.C.

Hosted by Larry Kudlow, the event is seen as a pivotal moment for Trump to court support from corporate leaders ahead of the upcoming general election. Trump is expected to highlight his extensive corporate experience, positioning himself as a seasoned leader capable of steering the nation’s economy.

In contrast, Biden’s campaign is pushing a narrative that challenges Trump’s business credentials. Biden spokesperson, James Singer, characterized Trump as incompetent and fraudulent, alleging that Trump’s tenure as both a businessman and president left the country economically devastated.

The campaign pointedly criticized Trump’s track record with bankruptcies in casinos, hotels, airlines, and his eponymous university, aiming to underscore what they perceive as a legacy of failed ventures.

Highlighting Biden’s economic achievements, the campaign emphasized a booming economy characterized by low unemployment rates, rising wages, and reduced inflation.

They credited these improvements to Biden’s policies, contrasting them with what they view as Trump’s economic missteps. The campaign positioned Biden as the candidate capable of sustaining economic growth and addressing the needs of American workers and families.

Conversely, Trump’s campaign defended his business record vigorously, asserting that he successfully built a billion-dollar real estate empire and fostered what they described as the greatest economy in American history during his presidency.

Trump’s spokesperson, Karoline Leavitt, criticized Biden’s economic policies for allegedly exacerbating inflation and increasing the cost of living without offering viable solutions. She portrayed Trump as a strong leader capable of revitalizing the economy and reaffirmed his popularity in recent polls as evidence of his enduring appeal.

The White House, represented by chief of staff Jeff Zients in Biden’s absence, sought to maintain a presence at the Business Roundtable event. With Biden traveling to the G-7 Summit in Italy, the administration continued to advocate for Biden’s economic agenda, aiming to counter Trump’s narrative directly to the corporate leaders in attendance.

The upcoming event represents a clash of narratives between Biden and Trump regarding economic stewardship and leadership qualities. Both campaigns are strategically leveraging Trump’s business background and Biden’s economic achievements to sway public opinion and corporate support ahead of the critical upcoming election.

Malawian Vice President Saulos Chilima and nine others were killed in a plane crash in the mountains of Malawi, as confirmed by President Lazarus Chakwera. The wreckage was located near Mzuzu after an extensive search a day after the plane vanished. President Chakwera expressed his deep sadness and confirmed that there were no survivors.

President Chakwera provided details during a live television address, explaining that the plane was found completely destroyed in the dense forest and hilly terrain. Chilima, aged 51, was among the victims, along with former first lady Shanil Dzimbiri and several other passengers and military crew members. They were en route to Mzuzu to attend a funeral for a former government minister.

The ill-fated flight was supposed to be a short 45-minute journey from Malawi’s capital, Lilongwe, to Mzuzu. However, the plane disappeared from radar after air traffic controllers instructed the pilot to return to Lilongwe due to poor weather conditions and visibility issues at Mzuzu’s airport. This led to a major search operation involving 300 police officers, 200 soldiers, and local forest rangers.

Saulos Chilima was in his second term as vice president, having previously served from 2014 to 2019 under former President Peter Mutharika. Despite facing corruption charges recently, these were dropped last month, with Chilima consistently denying any wrongdoing. His unexpected death marks a significant loss for the nation.

The crash not only claimed the lives of key political figures but also highlighted the challenges of aviation safety in adverse weather conditions. The nation mourns the loss of its vice president and others, reflecting on the impact of this tragic event on Malawi’s political and social landscape.

Israel has promised to keep fighting in Gaza and won’t talk to Hamas if the discussions don’t lead anywhere. This comes after the United Nations Security Council strongly supported a plan, backed by the US, to stop the eight-month-long conflict.

Reut Shapir Ben-Naftaly, Israel’s representative to the UN, reiterated her country’s commitment to ensuring Gaza’s future non-threatening status to Israel, emphasizing that the war would persist until all hostages were released and Hamas’ capabilities dismantled, accusing the militant group of using negotiations to stall for time.

After a 14-1 vote in favor of the US-drafted resolution at the UNSC, with Russia abstaining, the comprehensive three-stage peace deal, proposed by US President Joe Biden on May 31, received international support, intensifying pressure on both Hamas and Israel to cease hostilities.

US Secretary of State Antony Blinken, during his diplomatic visit to the Middle East, affirmed Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu’s backing of the ceasefire proposal and hostage release plan, contingent upon Hamas’ acceptance. Netanyahu reiterated his stance to continue the Gaza war until Hamas is eradicated and hostages freed.

Hamas welcomed the UNSC resolution, expressing readiness to engage in implementing measures such as Israeli forces’ withdrawal from Gaza and prisoner exchange. The resolution stated Israel’s acceptance of the plan, despite Netanyahu’s previous statements indicating otherwise.

While US officials assured Israel’s compliance with the obligations outlined in the plan, negotiations between Israel and Hamas to implement its provisions are ongoing. The deal, divided into three phases, includes an initial ceasefire, followed by the release of hostages and Palestinian prisoners, and ultimately culminating in the permanent cessation of hostilities and Israeli withdrawal from Gaza.